Citation

Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP11434 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Does Rosie Like Riveting? Male and Female Occupational Choices

Author(s): Grace Lordan and Jörn-Steffen Pischke

Publication Date: August 2016

Keyword(s): Gender, job content, Occupational choice and preferences

Programme Area(s): Labour Economics

Abstract: Occupational segregation and pay gaps by gender remain large while many of the constraints traditionally believed to be responsible for these gaps have weakened over time. Here, we explore the possibility that women and men have different tastes for the content of the work they do. We run regressions of job satisfaction on the share of males in an occupation. Overall, there is a strong negative relationship between female satisfaction and the share of males. This relationship is fairly stable across different specifications and contexts, and the magnitude of the association is not attenuated by personal characteristics or other occupation averages. Notably, the effect is muted for women but largely unchanged for men when we include three measures that proxy the content and context of the work in an occupation, which we label "people", "brains" and "brawn". These results suggest that women may care more about job content, and this is a possible factor preventing them from entering some male dominated professions. We continue to find a strong negative relationship between female satisfaction and the occupation level share of males in a separate analysis that includes share of males in the firm. This suggests that we are not just picking up differences in the work environment, although these seem to play an independent and important role as well.

For full details and related downloads, please visit: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11434

Bibliographic Reference

Lordan, G and Pischke, J. 2016. 'Does Rosie Like Riveting? Male and Female Occupational Choices'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11434