|
|
Accession
Countries Must Learn from Russia’s Mistakes
Over
the last decade recurring financial crises have plagued transition and
other emerging market countries. The recent experiences of Argentina and
Brazil have increased fears that similar crises may take place in the
future. A new CEPR Report, written by Enrico Perotti, Lessons from
the Russian Meltdown, examines the causes of the Russian crisis of
1998 and suggests that important lessons may be learned from this
episode for bank supervision in countries with weak enforcement
capacity. These lessons are particularly relevant to some Eastern
European countries aiming to join the EU.
The Report identifies the consequences on fiscal and financial behaviour
of soft legal constraints, resulting from weak enforcement institutions
and opportunistic behaviour. For countries in such circumstances, it
suggests that to increase financial stability, they must liberalize
their banking sector gradually. Countries with weak legal institutions
should start with a narrow, segmented banking sector, and a concentrated
commercial banking segment. The Report finds:
-
The
visible reason for the Russian crisis was an unsustainable fiscal
deficit coupled with massive capital flight. But the real causes were the structure of individual
incentives in a context of weak institutions, captured by special
interests.
-
The
lack of enforcement was further undermined by collective
non-compliance and a rouble overvaluation driven by international
support. This led to a build-up of non-payment, theft and capital
flight leading to the crisis. By
early 1998 the banking sector was insolvent, well before the fiscal
default.
-
Perotti
argues that it is now crucial for Russia to implement measures that
create incentives for prudent banking without relying too much on
prudential rules that can be easily bypassed or resisted when weak
institutions are in place.
-
While
most Western countries started their financial development with
extremely restrictive bank licensing policies, and only gradually
liberalized them, Russia made a leap into universal banking. This
was not the result of careful policy considerations, but the result
of regulatory capture by strong special interests. This attempt to
leapfrog the intermediate stages of financial development backfired
badly, allowing asset stripping and feeding extreme speculation.
-
The
Report recommends a shift from conventional prudential supervision
of universal banks to a policy of asset restrictions, segmentation
and limited competition in a two-tier banking sector.
-
A
layer of safe banking institutions, subject to asset restrictions,
and dedicated to payment and safekeeping services for retail
depositors, should be established to create a solid foundation for
the financial system. This segment may have limited deposit
insurance.
-
A second layer of banks, the commercial banks, would have no
restrictions on their lending but should not enjoy deposit
insurance. Such banks will need to obtain special operational licences
and capital requirements should be keep high to restrict entry.
-
A
concentrated commercial banking sector will restore profitability,
as a low degree of competition will maintain margins in less risky
lending. This creates
powerful incentives for banks to remain solvent in order to maintain
operating licences.
-
The
amount of lending by retail banks may progressively increase as the
institutional framework for debt collection and prudential
supervision improves.
CEPR is a network of 600 Research Fellows based throughout Europe, who collaborate through the Centre in research and its dissemination. CEPR helps its Research Fellows to develop projects, obtain their funding, administer them and disseminate their results. The Centre's research ranges from open economy macroeconomics to trade policy, from the economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe to regionalism in the world economy.
CEPR
Policy Paper 9
Contact Information:
For interview requests and further information about CEPR please contact CEPR Press Officer Robbie
Lonie, Tel: (44 020) 7878 2919, Mobile: 07740519225 or email
rlonie@cepr.org
|
|