Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP11266 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Why East Germany did not become a new Mezzogiorno

Author(s): Andrea Boltho, Wendy Carlin and Pasquale Scaramozzino

Publication Date: May 2016

Keyword(s): convergence, institutional quality, labour market flexibility and tradeables

Programme Area(s): Macroeconomics and Growth

Abstract: In an earlier paper (Journal of Comparative Economics, 1997) the authors argued, against the conventional wisdom of the time, that East Germany was unlikely to follow a development path similar to that of the Italian Mezzogiorno. This paper revisits the issue some 25 years after German reunification. Statistical tests show that the absence of income per capita convergence between South and North that has characterized Italy since the war, continued over the last two or more decades. Germany, on the other hand, has, over the same period, seen significant income convergence between East and West. The main explanations that are provided for such contrasting outcomes stress differences between the two countries (and within the two countries) in investment performance, in labour market flexibility, and, in particular, in developments in the tradeable sector whose performance in East Germany has been much superior to that of the Mezzogiorno. These differences, in turn, are linked to very different standards of institutional quality and governance which are almost certainly rooted in the two "poor"?regions' longer-run history.

For full details and related downloads, please visit:

Bibliographic Reference

Boltho, A, Carlin, W and Scaramozzino, P. 2016. 'Why East Germany did not become a new Mezzogiorno'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.