Citation
Discussion Paper Details
Please find the details for DP11284 in an easy to copy and paste format below:
Full Details | Bibliographic Reference
Full Details
Title: Excessive Competition for Headline Prices
Author(s): Roman Inderst and Martin Obradovits
Publication Date: May 2016
Keyword(s): attention, hidden fees, price competition, salience, shopping, shrouded charges and unshrouding
Programme Area(s): Industrial Organization
Abstract: When firms' shrouding of charges, as in Gabaix and Laibson (2006), meets with consumers' salient thinking, as in Bordalo et al. (2013), this can have severe welfare implications. The ensuing excessive competition for headline prices tends to inefficiently bias consumers' choice towards low-quality products, which is compounded when firms react and reduce quality beyond what would be cost efficient. As more intense shopping leads to a greater pass through of shrouded charges into lower headline prices, which aggravates the problem, competition policy is no substitute for consumer protection policy. While in our model all consumers are potential victims of salient thinking and shrouded charges, salient thinking becomes effective only for those who are attentive to different offers. Attentive consumers are likely to show ex-post regret and they can be ex-ante worse off, even though their choice set is larger. The combination of shrouding and salient thinking can sufficiently disadvantage high-quality firms so as to make them willing to educate consumers and unshroud all charges. While there is no unshrouding on equilibrium, high-quality firms' threat of unshrouding may sufficiently discipline firms to make efficient product choices.
For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11284
Bibliographic Reference
Inderst, R and Obradovits, M. 2016. 'Excessive Competition for Headline Prices'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11284