Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP11290 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Interpreting Recent Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Unemployment Benefit Extensions

Author(s): Marcus Hagedorn, Iourii Manovskii and Kurt Mitman

Publication Date: May 2016

Keyword(s): Unemployment and Unemployment insurance

Programme Area(s): Labour Economics and Monetary Economics and Fluctuations

Abstract: We critically review recent methodological and empirical contributions aiming to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effects of unemployment benefit extensions on the labor market and attempt to reconcile their apparently disparate findings. We describe two key challenges facing these studies - the endogeneity of benefit durations to labor market conditions and isolating true effects of actual policies from agents' responses to expectations of future policy changes. Marinescu (2015) employs a methodology that does not attempt to address these challenges. A more innovative approach in Coglianese (2015) and Chodorow-Reich and Karabarbounis (2016) attempts to overcome these challenges by exploiting a sampling error in unemployment rates as an exogenous variation. Unfortunately, we find that this approach falls prey to the very problems it aims to overcome and it appears unlikely that the fundamental bias at the core of this approach can be overcome. We find more promising the approach based on unexpected policy changes as in the recent contributions by Johnston and Mas (2015) and Hagedorn, Manovskii and Mitman (2015). This approach by design addresses the problem of benefit endogeneity. It does not, however, fully address the effects of expectations and generally yields a lower bound on the actual effects of policies.

For full details and related downloads, please visit:

Bibliographic Reference

Hagedorn, M, Manovskii, I and Mitman, K. 2016. 'Interpreting Recent Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Unemployment Benefit Extensions'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.