Citation
Discussion Paper Details
Please find the details for DP15276 in an easy to copy and paste format below:
Full Details | Bibliographic Reference
Full Details
Title: Credit demand vs. supply channels: Experimental- and administrative-based evidence
Author(s): Valentina Michelangeli, José Luis Peydró and Enrico Sette
Publication Date: September 2020
Keyword(s): bank lending channel, credit demand, credit supply, household balance sheet channel, Mortgages, risk-taking and SMEs
Programme Area(s): International Macroeconomics and Finance
Abstract: This paper identifies and quantifies â??for the first timeâ?? the relative importance of borrower (credit demand) versus bank (supply) balance-sheet channels. We submit fictitious applications (varying households' characteristics) to the major Italian online-mortgage platform. In this way we ensure that all banks receive exactly the same mortgage applications, and that â??for each applicationâ?? there are other identical ones except for one borrower-level characteristic. We find that: (i) Borrower and bank channels are equally strong in causing (and explaining) loan acceptance (each channel changes acceptance by 50 p.p. for the interquartile range and explains 29% of R-square). (ii) Differently, for pricing, borrower factors are much stronger. (iii) Banks supplying less credit accept riskier borrowers. Finally â??exploiting administrative credit register dataâ?? we document borrower-lender assortative matching: safer banks have more credit relations with safer firms. Moreover, the measure of credit supply estimated in the experiment (differently from a very similar measure estimated from the observational mortgage data) determines bank credit supply to firms and risk-taking in administrative data.
For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=15276
Bibliographic Reference
Michelangeli, V, Peydró, J and Sette, E. 2020. 'Credit demand vs. supply channels: Experimental- and administrative-based evidence'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=15276