Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP16007 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: The welfare cost of ignoring the beta

Author(s): Christian Gollier

Publication Date: April 2021

Keyword(s): Arrow-Lind theorem, Asset Pricing, Capital budgeting, Carbon Pricing, discounting, investment theory, Rare Disasters and WACC fallacy

Programme Area(s): Occasional Paper and Public Economics

Abstract: Because of risk aversion, any sensible investment valuation system should value less projects that contribute more to the aggregate risk, i.e., that have a larger income-elasticity of net benefits. In theory, this is done by adjusting discount rates to consumption betas. But in reality, for various reasons (Arrow-Lind and WACC fallacies, market failures), most public and private institutions and people use a discount rate that is rather insensitive to the risk profile of their investment projects. I show in this paper that the economic consequences of the implied misallocation of capital are dire. To do this, I calibrate a Lucas model in which the investment opportunity set contains a myriad of projects with different expected returns and risk profiles. The welfare loss of using a single discount rate is equivalent to a permanent reduction in consumption that lies somewhere between 15% and 45%, depending upon which familiar discounting system is used. Economists should devote more energy to support a reform of public discounting systems in favor of what has been advocated by the normative interpretation of modern asset pricing theories over the last four decades.

For full details and related downloads, please visit:

Bibliographic Reference

Gollier, C. 2021. 'The welfare cost of ignoring the beta'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.