Citation

Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP16444 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: The Effects of Biased Labor Market Expectations on Consumption, Wealth Inequality, and Welfare

Author(s): Almut Balleer, Georg Duernecker, Susanne Forstner and Johannes Goensch

Publication Date: August 2021

Keyword(s): Consumption, Inequality, labor markets, Saving, subjective expectations and wealth

Programme Area(s): Macroeconomics and Growth

Abstract: Idiosyncratic labor risk is a prevalent phenomenon with important implications for individual choices. In labor market research it is commonly assumed that agents have rational expectations and therefore they correctly assess the risk they face in the labor market. We analyze survey data for the U.S. and document a substantial optimistic bias of households in their subjective expectations about future labor market transitions. Furthermore, we analyze the heterogeneity in the bias across different demographic groups and we find that high-school graduates tend to be vastly over-optimistic about their labor market prospects, whereas college graduates have rather precise beliefs. In the context of a quantitative heterogenous agents lifecycle model we show that the optimistic bias has a quantitatively sizable negative effect on the life-cycle allocation of income, consumption and wealth and implies a substantial loss in individual welfare compared to the allocation under full information. Moreover, we establish that the heterogeneity in the bias leads to pronounced differences in the accumulation of assets across individuals, and is thereby a quantitatively important driver of inequality in wealth.

For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=16444

Bibliographic Reference

Balleer, A, Duernecker, G, Forstner, S and Goensch, J. 2021. 'The Effects of Biased Labor Market Expectations on Consumption, Wealth Inequality, and Welfare'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=16444