Citation

Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP4886 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Is Cash Negative Debt? A Hedging Perspective on Corporate Financial Policies

Author(s): Viral V. Acharya, Heitor Almeida and Murillo Campello

Publication Date: February 2005

Keyword(s): cash holdings, debt policies, financing constraints, hedging and risk management

Programme Area(s): Financial Economics

Abstract: We model the interplay between cash and debt policies in the presence of financial constraints. While saving cash allows constrained firms to hedge against future cash flow shortfalls, reducing current debt ? ?saving borrowing capacity? ? is a more effective way of securing investment in high cash flow states. This trade-off implies that constrained firms will allocate cash flows into cash holdings if their hedging needs are high (i.e., if the correlation between operating cash flows and investment opportunities is low). Those same firms, however, will use free cash flows to reduce current debt if their hedging needs are low. The empirical examination of debt and cash policies of a large sample of firms reveals evidence that is consistent with our theory. In particular, our evidence shows that financially constrained firms with high hedging needs have a strong propensity to save cash out of cash flows while leaving their debt positions unchanged. In contrast, constrained firms with low hedging needs direct most of their free cash flows towards debt reduction, as opposed to cash savings. Our analysis points to an important hedging motive behind standard financial policies such as cash and debt management. It suggests that cash should not be viewed as negative debt.

For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=4886

Bibliographic Reference

Acharya, V, Almeida, H and Campello, M. 2005. 'Is Cash Negative Debt? A Hedging Perspective on Corporate Financial Policies'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=4886