Citation

Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP6200 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Framing Effects in Political Decision Making: Evidence From a Natural Voting Experiment

Author(s): Monika Bütler and Michel André Maréchal

Publication Date: March 2007

Keyword(s): bounded rationality, direct democracy, framing effect, natural experiment, pension reform and voting

Programme Area(s): Public Economics

Abstract: This paper analyzes a recent ballot in which two virtually identical popular initiatives, both demanding a decrease in the legal age of retirement in Switzerland, led to differences in approval rates of nearly seven percentage points. Based on this unique natural experiment, the existence of emphasis framing effects is tested for and their determinants are identified outside of the controlled settings of laboratories. Nonetheless, the analyzed setting allows for considerably more control than usually available in the field: All party, government and interest group recommendations were symmetric for both initiatives, and the simultaneous vote rules out potential variation of individual preferences and compositional changes of the electorate over time. Using community and individual level data it is shown that the difference in approval rates is largely due to the different emphases in the initiatives' titles.

For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=6200

Bibliographic Reference

Bütler, M and Maréchal, M. 2007. 'Framing Effects in Political Decision Making: Evidence From a Natural Voting Experiment'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=6200