Discussion Paper Details
Please find the details for DP6521 in an easy to copy and paste format below:
Title: Does the Order and Timing of Active Labour Market Programmes Matter?
Author(s): Michael Lechner and Stephan Wiehler
Publication Date: October 2007
Keyword(s): Active Labour market policy, matching estimation, panel data and programme evaluation
Programme Area(s): Labour Economics
Abstract: This paper extends the traditional focus of active labour market policy evaluation from a static comparison of participation in a programme versus nonparticipation (or participation in another programme) to the evaluation of the effects of programme sequences, i.e. multiple participation or timing of such programmes. We use a dynamic evaluation framework that explicitly allows for dynamic selection into different stages of such sequences based on past intermediate outcomes to analyze multiple programmes, the timing of programmes, and the order of programmes. The analysis is based on exceptionally comprehensive data on the Austrian labour force. Our findings suggest that (i) active job search programmes are more effective after a qualification programme compared to the reverse order, that (ii) multiple participations in qualification measures dominates single participation, and that (iii) the effectiveness of specific labour market programmes deteriorates the later they start during an unemployment spell.
For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=6521
Lechner, M and Wiehler, S. 2007. 'Does the Order and Timing of Active Labour Market Programmes Matter?'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=6521