Citation

Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP8351 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: How Prediction Markets Can Save Event Studies

Author(s): Erik Snowberg, Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz

Publication Date: April 2011

Keyword(s): event studies, political economy and prediction markets

Programme Area(s): Financial Economics and Public Economics

Abstract: This review paper articulates the relationship between prediction market data and event studies, with a special focus on applications in political economy. Event studies have been used to address a variety of political economy questions from the economic effects of party control of government to the importance of complex rules in congressional committees. However, the results of event studies are notoriously sensitive to both choices made by researchers and external events. Specifically, event studies will generally produce different results depending on three interrelated things: which event window is chosen, the prior probability assigned to an event at the beginning of the event window, and the presence or absence of other events during the event window. In this paper we show how each of these may bias the results of event studies, and how prediction markets can mitigate these biases.

For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=8351

Bibliographic Reference

Snowberg, E, Wolfers, J and Zitzewitz, E. 2011. 'How Prediction Markets Can Save Event Studies'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=8351