Discussion Paper Details

Please find the details for DP9547 in an easy to copy and paste format below:

Full Details   |   Bibliographic Reference

Full Details

Title: Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus: A Survey Experiment in the Field

Author(s): Vincenzo Galasso and Tommaso Nannicini

Publication Date: July 2013

Keyword(s): competitive persuasion, gender differences and political campaigns

Programme Area(s): Public Economics

Abstract: This paper investigates the differential response of male and female voters to competitive persuasion in political campaigns. During the 2011 municipal elections in Milan, a sample of eligible voters was randomly divided into three groups. Two were exposed to the same incumbent?s campaign but to different opponent?s campaigns, with either a positive or a negative tone. The third?control?group received no electoral information. The campaigns were administered online and consisted of a bundle of advertising tools (videos, texts, slogans). Stark gender differences emerge. Negative advertising increases men?s turnout, but has no effect on women. Females, however, vote more for the opponent and less for the incumbent when they are exposed to the opponent?s positive campaign. Exactly the opposite occurs for males. Additional tests show that our results are not driven by gender identification with the candidate, ideology, or other voter?s observable attributes. Effective strategies of persuasive communication should thus take gender into account. Our results may also help to reconcile the conflicting evidence on the effect of negative vs. positive advertising, as the average impact may wash out when aggregated across gender.

For full details and related downloads, please visit:

Bibliographic Reference

Galasso, V and Nannicini, T. 2013. 'Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus: A Survey Experiment in the Field'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.