Citation
Discussion Paper Details
Please find the details for DP9677 in an easy to copy and paste format below:
Full Details | Bibliographic Reference
Full Details
Title: Does Economic Growth Reduce Corruption? Theory and Evidence from Vietnam
Author(s): Jie Bai, Seema Jayachandran, Edmund J. Malesky and Benjamin Olken
Publication Date: October 2013
Keyword(s): corruption and economic growth
Programme Area(s): Development Economics and Public Economics
Abstract: Government corruption is more prevalent in poor countries than in rich countries. This paper uses cross-industry heterogeneity in growth rates within Vietnam to test empirically whether growth leads to lower corruption. We find that it does. We begin by developing a model of government officials' choice of how much bribe money to extract from firms that is based on the notion of inter-regional tax competition, and consider how officials' choices change as the economy grows. We show that economic growth is predicted to decrease the rate of bribe extraction under plausible assumptions, with the benefit to officials of demanding a given share of revenue as bribes outweighed by the increased risk that firms will move elsewhere. This effect is dampened if firms are less mobile. Our empirical analysis uses survey data collected from over 13,000 Vietnamese firms between 2006 and 2010 and an instrumental variables strategy based on industry growth in other provinces. We find, first, that firm growth indeed causes a decrease in bribe extraction. Second, this pattern is particularly true for firms with strong land rights and those with operations in multiple provinces, consistent with these firms being more mobile. Our results suggest that as poor countries grow, corruption could subside
For full details and related downloads, please visit: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=9677
Bibliographic Reference
Bai, J, Jayachandran, S, Malesky, E and Olken, B. 2013. 'Does Economic Growth Reduce Corruption? Theory and Evidence from Vietnam'. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=9677