DP10388 Was the Classical Gold Standard Credible on the Periphery? Evidence from Currency Risk
|Author(s):||Kris James Mitchener, Marc Weidenmier|
|Publication Date:||February 2015|
|Keyword(s):||currency risk, fixed exchange rates, gold standard, sovereign borrowing|
|JEL(s):||F22, F33, F36, F41, N10, N20|
|Programme Areas:||Economic History|
|Link to this Page:||cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10388|
We use a standard metric from international finance, the currency risk premium, to assess the credibility of fixed exchange rates during the classical gold standard era. Theory suggests that a completely credible and permanent commitment to join the gold standard would have zero currency risk or no expectation of devaluation. We find that, even five years after a typical emerging-market country joined the gold standard, the currency risk premium averaged at least 220 basis points. Fixed- effects, panel-regression estimates that control for a variety of borrower-specific factors also show large and positive currency risk premia. In contrast to core gold standard countries, such as France and Germany, the persistence of large premia, long after gold standard adoption, suggest that financial markets did not view the pegs in emerging markets as credible and expected devaluation.