DP12065 Journal Competition and the Quality of Published Research: Simultaneous versus Sequential Screening
|Author(s):||Thomas Gehrig, Rune Stenbacka|
|Publication Date:||May 2017|
|Keyword(s):||assessment of research quality, competition between journals, Information Acquisition, simultaneous versus sequential screening|
|JEL(s):||D80, L10, L13|
|Programme Areas:||Industrial Organization|
|Link to this Page:||cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=12065|
We explore how the nature of the screening technology and the organization of the submission system affect the screening incentives of competing journals. Total screening in a duopolistic journal industry exceeds that of a monopoly. Exclusivity requirements for submissions induce more screening than systems with parallel submission. Interestingly, in the sequential screening model established journal rankings tend to reduce screening incentives. The screening technology determines whether the high-ranked or low-ranked journal have stronger screening incentives, which has implications for the long-run stability of established rankings.