DP1284 Non-Keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes: International Evidence and the Swedish Experience
|Author(s):||Francesco Giavazzi, Marco Pagano|
|Publication Date:||November 1995|
|Keyword(s):||Fiscal Policy, Private Consumption, Private Investment, Public Consumption, Public Debt, Public Deficit, Stabilization|
|JEL(s):||E21, E22, E62, E63, E65|
|Programme Areas:||International Macroeconomics|
|Link to this Page:||cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1284|
In earlier work we documented two episodes in which a sharp fiscal consolidation was associated with a surprisingly large expansion in private domestic demand. In this paper we draw on further evidence to investigate if and when fiscal policy changes can have such non-Keynesian effects. In the first part of the paper, we analyse cross-country data for 19 OECD countries. In the second part we concentrate on the Swedish fiscal expansion of the early 1990s. The cross-country evidence on private consumption confirms that fiscal policy changes - both contractions and expansions - can have non-Keynesian effects if they are sufficiently large and persistent. It also suggests that these effects can result not only from changes in public consumption, but to some extent also from changes in taxes and transfers. The latter result is also consistent with the Swedish experience, where a decrease in net taxes (with almost no change in public consumption) was associated with a dramatic fall in private domestic demand. Our evidence and that from other studies agree that during the Swedish fiscal expansion of the early 1990s a large negative error should be interpreted, but it is clear that the most obvious candidates (wealth effects and after-tax real interest rate effects) are not sufficient to explain it. This error may reflect a large downward revision of permanent disposable income, which affected the consumption choices of Swedish households over and beyond the negative effects of the drop in real asset prices. We suggest that this downward revision in permanent disposable income may have been triggered, at least partly, by the fiscal expansion of the early 1990s.