DP15141 Power, Scrutiny, and Congressmen's Favoritism for Friends' Firm
| Author(s): | Quoc-Anh Do, Yen-Teik Lee, Kieu-Trang Nguyen, Bang Dang Nguyen |
| Publication Date: | August 2020 |
| Date Revised: | August 2020 |
| Keyword(s): | close election, congressmen, favoritism, political connection, Power, RDD, scrutiny |
| JEL(s): | D72, D73, D85, G14, G32 |
| Programme Areas: | Labour Economics, Public Economics, Financial Economics |
| Link to this Page: | cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=15141 |
Does more political power always lead to more favoritism? The usual affirmative answer overlooks scrutiny's role in shaping the pattern of favoritism over the ladder of power. When attaining higher-powered positions under even stricter scrutiny, politicians may reduce quid-pro-quo favors towards connected firms to preserve their career prospect. Around close Congress elections, we find RDD-based evidence of this adverse effect that a politician's win reduces his former classmates' firms stock value by 2.8%. As predicted, this effect varies by cross-state scrutiny, politicians' power, firms' size and governance, and connection strength. It diminishes as a politician's career concern fades over time.