DP3693 Are Intellectual Property Rights Unfair?
|Publication Date:||January 2003|
|Keyword(s):||human capital, income distribution, inequality, innovation, intellectual property rights, redistribution, welfare state|
|JEL(s):||D30, H23, I30, J24, J31, O34|
|Programme Areas:||International Macroeconomics, Labour Economics|
|Link to this Page:||cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=3693|
If redistribution is distortionary, and if the income of skilled workers is due to knowledge-intensive activities and depends positively on intellectual property, a social planner which cares about income distribution may in principle want to use a reduction in Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) rather than redistributive transfers. On the one hand, such a reduction reduces statis inefficiency. On the other hand, standard redistribution also reduces the level of R&D because it distorts occupational choice. We study this possibility in the context of a model with horizontal innovation, where the government, in addition to taxes and transfers, controls the fraction of innovations that are granted patents. The model predicts that standard redistribution always dominates limitations to IPRs.