DP8852 Bank Bonuses and Bail-outs
| Author(s): | Hendrik Hakenes, Isabel Schnabel |
| Publication Date: | February 2012 |
| Keyword(s): | bank bail-outs, bank management compensation, bonus payments, limited and unlimited liability, risk-shifting, underinvestment |
| JEL(s): | G21, G28, J33, M52 |
| Programme Areas: | Financial Economics |
| Link to this Page: | cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=8852 |
This paper shows that bonus contracts may arise endogenously as a response to agency problems within banks, and analyzes how compensation schemes change in reaction to anticipated bail-outs. If there is a risk-shifting problem, bail-out expectations lead to steeper bonus schemes and even more risk-taking. If there is an effort problem, the compensation scheme becomes flatter and effort decreases. If both types of agency problems are present, a sufficiently large increase in bail-out perceptions makes it optimal for a welfare-maximizing regulator to impose caps on bank bonuses. In contrast, raising managers? liability is counterproductive.