Discussion paper

DP2119 An Optimal Currency Area Perspective of the EU Enlargement to the CEECs

This paper tries to assess whether it would be optimal for the CEECs to form a monetary uni on with either Germany or the EU. This cannot be done without discussing first the Maastricht criteria, which are the condition ‘sine qua non’ for a country to be eligible. Yet, they are often independent from more structural criteria (Bayoumi and Eichengreen (1996b)). Hence, this paper argues that although the CEECs do not satisfy -yet- the Maastricht criteria, their economic cycle is close enough to that of the EU and Germany for a monetary union to bring them great benefits. Indeed, using a methodology derived by L. Reichlin and M. Forni (1997) and C. Fuss (1997), it can be shown that (i) the percentage of CEECs business cycle fluctuations explained by a German shock is very high,; (ii) furthermore, the impulse responses are positively correlated. These suggest that the CEECs would not suffer from a common monetary policy .

£6.00
Citation

Boone, L and M Maurel (1999), ‘DP2119 An Optimal Currency Area Perspective of the EU Enlargement to the CEECs‘, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2119. CEPR Press, Paris & London. https://cepr.org/publications/dp2119