Discussion paper

DP15809 Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda

Researchers frequently use variants of the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism to elicit willingness to pay (WTP). These variants involve numerous incentive-irrelevant design choices, some of which carry advantages for implementation but may deteriorate participant comprehension or trust in the mechanism, which are well-known problems with the BDM. We highlight three such features and test them in the field in rural Uganda, a relevant population for many recent applications. Comprehension is very high, and 86 percent of participants bid optimally for an induced-value voucher, with little variation across treatments. This gives confidence for similar applications, and suggests the comprehension-expediency trade-off is mild.

£6.00
Citation

Burchardi, K, J de Quidt, S Gulesci, B Lerva and S Tripodi (2021), ‘DP15809 Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda‘, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 15809. CEPR Press, Paris & London. https://cepr.org/publications/dp15809