DP19172 Inflation is always and everywhere Not Conflict
According to Lorenzoni and Werning (2023a), “Conflict is the most general and proximate cause of inflation”. I show that this view involves both theoretical and conceptual shortcomings. My critique is based on two main arguments.
Firstly, equilibrium conflict inflation is indeterminate, and thus does not provide a well-defined theory of inflation. The primary reason for the indeterminacy is that it is a theory based on relative prices and not on the price level.
Secondly, I argue that in almost all models, inflation is determined by monetary and/or fiscal policy. Conflict, on the other hand, plays no role in determining the steady-state inflation rate, in contrast to the claim in Lorenzoni and Werning (2023a). Similarly to the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, it merely describes a relationship between output and inflation without determining either of them.
To support my arguments, I use four standard frameworks for price-level determination: The New Keynesian model in which monetary policy sets the nominal interest rate, a money-in-utility model in which the central bank sets the money supply, the Lagos and Wright (2005) model and the Demand Theory of the Price Level (Hagedorn, 2016).
