Discussion paper

DP2777 Third Party Monitoring and Golden Parachutes

When today?s actions can affect tomorrow's value of an asset and when the principal does not have access to hard information, either about productive activity or monitoring activity, two incentive problems must be simultaneously solved: first, the ?ex-ante? moral hazard problem of inducing higher productive effort from the agent; second, the ?ex-post? problem of inducing auditing and revelation of information from the auditor. Somewhat surprisingly, the first best can be attained in the negative externality (higher effort decreases the expected future quality of the asset) case: it is enough for the principal to commit to reallocate the right to use the asset at the end of the first period.
In the positive externality case (when higher effort increases the future expected quality of the asset) a change in the rights to use the asset is no longer sufficient for efficiency in the second best situation. Rather, auditing by a potential entrant becomes necessary and a mix of property rights reallocation and transfers is necessary to solve the two incentive problems. We show that the second best optimal takes the form of a generalized ?golden parachute? contract where for high outputs the agent is replaced by the third party and leaves with a fixed compensation.


Iossa, E and P Legros (2001), ‘DP2777 Third Party Monitoring and Golden Parachutes‘, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2777. CEPR Press, Paris & London. https://cepr.org/publications/dp2777