|
|
Bulletin
44/45 APRIL/JUNE 1991
IN
THIS DOUBLE ISSUE...
Structural
Adjustment Programmes
Participants in a Paris conference jointly organized by CEPR and the
OECD Development Centre assessed the interactions among trade,
macroeconomic and sectoral policies, with particular emphases on the
sequencing of reforms, their impact on agriculture and their
implications for world trade patterns.
European
Monetary Union
A CEPR joint conference with Georgetown University's Center for
German and European Studies and the IMF focused on the theoretical and
institutional issues raised by the Draft Statutes of the proposed
European Central Bank.
Privatization
Both theoretical papers and case-studies were presented at a Milan
conference on the privatization of public enterprises held jointly by
CEPR and the Italian Macroeconomic Policy Group.
Regime
Changes
Participants in a London workshop considered the implications of
changes to policy regimes, with a particular emphasis on the learning
processes used by private agents to modify their expectations following
such a change.
Public
Finance
Participants in a joint CEPR workshop with HM Treasury on discount
rates and rates of return in the public sector discussed the economic
implications of the present UK regime.
European
Integration
Papers presented at a Kiel workshop of the Centre's research project
on The Consequences of `1992' for International Trade discussed the
detailed modelling of particular industrial sectors and simulations of
effects of economic policy.
Lunchtime Meetings
Rudiger Dornbusch discussed the consequences of economic and monetary
union for the management of EC countries' public
debt and
the Community's external exchange rate.
Gordon Hughes argued that European and American experience of local
government finance
suggests that whatever system emerges from present UK proposals to
reform the Poll Tax will retain its main structural defects.
Colin Mayer maintained that the European Commission's current proposals
to extend banking regulations to cover non-bank financial institutions
risk stifling the closer integration of European
financial markets.
Peter Bofinger asserted that the effectiveness of East European
governments' basically well designed exchange
rate policies
is currently impeded by the absence of a credible peg for their
currencies and a bankruptcy constraint.
David Newbery argued that in privatizing
electricity industry
in England and Wales the UK government failed to exploit the potential
of feasible competition and is more likely to be forced into regulating
the industry to avoid the high costs of duopoly.
Heather Joshi assessed the implications of long-term trends in divorce
for the provision
of pensions
on the UK.
|
|