UK Trade
The Community effect

The pattern of UK trade has changed significantly since her accession to the European Community (EC) in 1973, as other members of the Community have accounted for an increasing proportion of UK imports and exports. It is not clear how far these changes can be attributed to EEC membership. In Discussion Paper No. 110, Research Fellow L Alan Winters discusses the difficulties of measuring the effects of accession on UK exports and imports of manufactures, and discusses several studies which have attempted to provide such estimates. He also discusses the problems of assessing the welfare effects of accession and offers tentative conclusions about its overall impact on economic welfare in the United Kingdom.

The dramatic changes which occurred during the 1970s in the pattern of British trade in manufactures suggest that accession mattered. Prior to 1973, European countries were gradually increasing their shares of British exports and imports; subsequently, however, the shares of the original six EC members shot up and those of other European countries fell, while those of non-European countries continued to decline at faster rates. Furthermore, after 1973 the share of imports in total UK purchases of manufactures rose even faster than before, suggesting that goods from the Six were displacing domestic sales. The behaviour of the UK share of foreign markets also suggested strong integration effects: prior to 1973 the UK share fell in all markets, but subsequently her shares in EC markets rose or stabilized, while those in other markets fell faster.

Winters surveys previous attempts to measure the effects of accession, and concludes that many of the techniques used in these studies do not capture adequately the effects of accession. Winters' own investigations are based on consumer demand theory. They stress the importance of modelling import flows and domestic sales simultaneously, because the substitution between EC and non-EC imports is critically affected by the demand for home products. Winters' studies also incorporate the effects of relative prices on market shares in a rigorous fashion consistent with the economic theory of consumer behaviour.

Rough estimates based on this approach suggest that by 1979, as a result of accession, home sales fell by #8 billion. UK imports of manufactures from her new Community partners rose by #8 billion, such that for every individual member of the Six, over half of actual UK imports in 1979 can be attributed to accession, with imports from West Germany alone rising by #3.75 billion. Exports of UK manufactures rose by #3 billion, the result of a #4.5 billion increase in exports to partners and a decrease in exports to other countries of #1.5 billion.

It is clear that accession worsened Britain's trade balance in manufactures, Winters concludes, but he argues that this was not necessarily a bad thing. It gave Britons access to cheaper and better manufactures and probably had little effect on the balance of payments or on aggregate demand. These are determined largely by macroeconomic factors independent of trade policy, and so the increased deficit in manufactures was mostly offset by increased surpluses or reduced deficits in other sectors. Assessing the effect of accession on welfare is much more complex, according to Winters. Although the changes in manufacturing trade were probably beneficial to the United Kingdom, Winters argues that economists have not yet produced soundly based and convincing estimates of these welfare effects.

A fuller discussion of the effects of accession on UK trade can be found in the article by L Alan Winters in Bulletin No. 15.


Britain in Europe: A Survey
of Quantitative Trade Studies
L Alan Winters

Discussion Paper No. 110, June 1986 (IT)