|
|
Stabilization
Policy
The Mexican crisis
In the early 1990s, Mexico enjoyed a boom with the implementation of
NAFTA. This led to a large reduction in the risk premium on capital and
the resulting surge in investment caused a large shock to aggregate
demand. The commitment to the fixed exchange rate led to an inability to
choke off this boom by monetary tightness; the result was rising costs
and prices, which, most critically, reduced exports and promoted
imports, ultimately lowering aggregate demand and thus output. At the
same time, the investment boom led to a potential expansion in supply
capacity, which would work against the tendency for rising costs and
prices, but only gradually.
In Discussion Paper No. 1241, Gregor Irwin and
Research Fellow David Vines analyse the events leading to the
devaluation of the Mexican peso last year, using a simple two-period
model. They view the problem as a race between a foreign investment led
demand boom and the potential expansion in supply which might follow.
In their two-period model, the approach is to solve for the range of
realizations for the state variable – which determines the
extent of the supply expansion in the second period – over
which the government is willing to maintain the fixed exchange rate
regime. They then develop the basic model and focus on how unanticipated
exogenous factors can lead to the imposition of an external financing
constraint, with the reversal in capital flow during the second period.
Their analysis suggests that a government, in the first stages of an
exchange rate-based reform, should attempt to dampen consumption
expenditure so as to `make way' for non-inflationary investment, thus
reducing the competitiveness problem in the second period. They also
suggest that it would be beneficial for the government to promote direct
investment rather than portfolio investment: the former is likely to be
more stable, making the economy less vulnerable to a reversal in capital
flow. One last message may be to avoid exchange rate-based stabilization
altogether: it may be better to float the exchange rate and then to base
macroeconomic discipline around a tight regime for monetary aggregates
(or an explicit inflation target).
The Macroeconomics of the Mexican Crisis: A
Simple Two-period Model
Gregor Irwin and David Vines
Discussion Paper No. 1241, September 1995
(IM)
|
|