|
|
Gold
Standard
No automatic pilot
The pre-1914 gold standard is often cited as an
example of an international monetary regime which ensured economic
stability and growth without continuing adjustments of fiscal and
monetary policy by the participating countries. Can stability be
achieved with so little effort by governments? In Discussion Paper No.
125, Research Fellow Willem Buiter studies an idealized gold
standard using a simple two-country model. Each country is assumed to
guarantee the convertibility of its currency into gold at a fixed price
as long as its gold reserves exceed some threshold. When a country's
gold reserves fall below that threshold, convertibility is ended and a
period of free floating begins. The quantity of gold is assumed to be
fixed in the model. Buiter considers how monetary and fiscal policies
affect the survival of the gold standard and the likelihood of either
currency being the victim of the speculative selling attack that ends
it.
The behaviour of reserves and the survival of the gold standard in
Buiter's model depends on the difference between home and foreign Domestic
Credit Expansion (DCE), and the difference between changes in the
home and foreign demand for money. Buiter assumes that these variables
can be represented by continuous- time versions of a random walk (in
which the value next period will be equal to the current value plus an
independent random disturbance). Buiter also incorporates trend
behaviour in these variables by allowing 'drift' in the random walk.
If money demand growth and DCE behave as random walks, the gold standard
is not viable: it is certain to collapse within a finite period. There
are, however, some policies that help postpone the inevitable collapse.
Not surprisingly, a rise in the world stock of physical gold, or of
'paper gold' created by international organizations such as the IMF,
increases the expected duration of the gold standard. Buiter also finds
that a given stock of reserves can be redistributed between the two
countries so as to increase the life expectancy of the gold standard.
Such redistributions may be difficult to achieve voluntarily, however,
since they make the country that has given up reserves more likely to be
the victim of the selling attack that ends the gold standard.
Policies which change the behaviour of DCEs alter the expected survival
period of the gold standard, but unless policy completely offsets the
exogenous shocks to the economy, it only postpones the inevitable
exhaustion of one country's reserves. Buiter demonstrates that
responsive or 'conditional' policy rules for DCE can sustain the gold
standard indefinitely. One such policy rule adjusts DCE immediately to
accommodate changes in the demand for money which originate in shocks to
the economy. By continuously matching variations in the stock of
domestic credit with real-income-related variations in money demand, the
level of reserves is stabilized perfectly and the viability of the gold
standard seems assured.
Buiter notes that this policy is problematic, however, for by
stabilizing the stock of reserves it risks destabilizing the national
debt. Suppose that in addition to following this policy for DCE, the
authorities balance the budget continuously: variations in the stock of
domestic credit are therefore matched by variations in the national
debt. In the simplest case, the national debt will follow a random walk
and as a result will, over time, exceed any limit, however high. An
international reserve crisis has been exchanged for a government
solvency crisis.
Buiter argues that the gold standard is essentially an extreme version
of a commodity price stabilization scheme, which aims not merely to
stabilize but to fix the price of a commodity-gold. He concludes that
its operation is far from automatic and its survival is not assured. It
cannot survive if governments follow 'unconditional' policy rules. To
avoid both the collapse of the gold standard and a public sector
solvency crisis, monetary and fiscal policy must respond flexibly
to disturbances to the economy.
A Gold Standard Isn't Viable Unless
Supported by Sufficiently Flexible Monetary
and Fiscal Policy
Willem Buiter
Discussion Paper No. 125, August 1986 (IM)
|
|