During the last few years the economic relationships between
developed and developing countries have been studied using models in
which the world economy is disaggregated into geopolitical blocs, whose
interaction provides a complete account of the behaviour of the world
economy as a whole. These blocs are often taken to consist of the
developed countries (the North), the oil-importing developing countries
(the South), and OPEC. In previous CEPR Discussion Papers (Nos. 164 and
165), Research Fellow Michael Beenstock has reported estimates of
separate econometric models for the Northern and Southern blocs. In
Discussion Paper No. 230, he reports the results of simulations in which
the two models are linked in order to investigate economic
interdependence between North and South.
Beenstock argues strongly for what he terms the `econometric' approach
to analysing interdependence between the rich and poor countries. He
criticizes the `oracular' approach, which relies on simulation models in
which `plausible' parameter values are gleaned from the empirical
literature. We insist on empirical scrutiny of the models used to
analyse national policies, and demand that such models describe the past
to a reasonable degree. The same criteria should be used to evaluate
policy at the international level as well, Beenstock argues.
In Beenstock's Northern model the main endogenous variables were GDP,
inflation, interest rates and primary product prices. For the South the
principal endogenous variables concerned the balance of payments and
included exports, imports, capital flows, reserves and the exchange
rate: no attempt was made to model the determinants of economic growth
and inflation in the South, which were assumed to be exogenous. Imports
and exports of each bloc were composed of primary non-oil products and
manufactured products. Prices were disaggregated further into oil prices
and non-oil primary product prices, as well as import and export prices.
In both of the separate models, economic activity outside each bloc was
assumed to be given: thus the behaviour of the Northern economies was
assumed to be given in the Southern model and vice versa. In the present
Discussion Paper, Beenstock introduces interdependence in two stages. He
first introduces shocks to the Northern variables in the Southern model,
while these Northern variables remain exogenous (and vice versa). This
helps reveal, for example, how an autonomous economic expansion in the
North affects the South and how an autonomous increase in external debt
in the South affects the North. In the second stage he simulates both
models jointly, allowing Northern shocks to affect the South with
further feedbacks to the North, while Southern shocks similarly rebound
off the North back onto the South. In these joint simulations many of
the previously exogenous Northern and Southern variables are endogenized,
in the sense that they are allowed to affect each other. OPEC's
behaviour is not modelled: in particular the price of oil is assumed to
be exogenous.
Trade and capital linkages form the basis of North-South interdependence
in Beenstock's models, but data deficiencies prevent him from analysing
these directly. Instead he models the international (non-oil) primary
product market and the international capital market, in which commodity
prices and world interest rates are determined. Increased GDP in the
North raises export demand in the South, for example, while the supply
of Southern exports depends on relative prices and the South's
productive potential. Increased export earnings raise the South's demand
for external indebtedness. Balance of payments deficits also influence
external indebtedness but if debt grows too rapidly the South devalues
and this helps to boost exports and lower imports.
An increase in Southern indebtedness puts upward pressure on world
interest rates. Higher interest rates reduce aggregate supply in the
North via a fall in the capital stock. At the same time interest rates
vary directly with Northern economic activity and with bond-financed
fiscal deficits in the North, and inversely with OPEC surpluses
deposited in the international capital market. Higher interest rates
reduce the demand for inventories of primary products: commodity prices
fall; this adversely affects the South's terms of trade and its
international price competitiveness. Higher commodity prices adversely
affect aggregate supply in the North. At the same time commodity prices
vary directly with global economic activity. Finally, the relative price
of non-oil commodities varies directly with oil prices, which also
adversely affect economic activity in the North.
Beenstock cautions that the paper is essentially experimental and
describes what happens when the two models are `docked': research of
this type is in its infancy, and the results of the simulation exercises
already suggest improvements to the design of the models. The
simulations do suggest, however, that the North affects the South to a
much greater extent than vice versa; that Southern demand for imports
from the North does not appear to affect Northern economic activity to
any significant extent, but that the benefits to the South of expansion
in the North are magnified by the resulting increase in commodity prices
and the associated improvement in Southern terms of trade.
An Econometric Investigation of North-South Interdependence
Michael Beenstock
Discussion Paper No. 230, March 1988 (IM)