|
|
North-South
Relations
Trade Cycles ?
In the mid-1970s
high prices of primary commodities were associated with a low rate of
growth of advanced regions of the world (the 'North'). In the early
1980s low prices of primary commodities have been associated with a low
rate of growth of the less-developed regions (the 'South'). Does the
first event lead to the second, or vice versa? Or is there an
equilibrium growth process in which the North and South grow in step?
What might determine such an equilibrium growth rate - the availability
of primary commodities?
CEPR Research Fellow David Vines uses a formal model in Discussion Paper
No. 26 to suggest answers to these questions. The world is divided into
two regions: the more developed 'North', which produces capital goods
(machines), and the less developed 'South', which produces consumption
goods (primary products, such as food). Like other recent North-South
models it focuses on the complementarity of Northern output (capital
goods) and Southern output (consumption goods) and identifies the
North-South terms of trade as a mechanism linking the growth rates of
the two regions. Vines attempts to incorporate into his model ideas on
these issues to be found in earlier writings of Lord Kaldor.
Vines's model suggests that in the long run, world growth is constrained
by the availability of natural resources and land and by technical
progress in their use. In this it differs from the recent North-South
analyses put forward by Findlay and Taylor. These authors locate the
ultimate determinants of world growth respectively in Northern labour
force growth and in Northern investment dynamism.
Vines also argues that the terms-of-trade linkage between North and
South is a loose one. As a result, in response to events like the energy
crisis or agricultural crop failure, the North- South terms of trade may
exhibit exaggerated 'overshooting' behaviour, moving towards a new
equilibrium, but then beyond it. Furthermore, a cyclical process of
adjustment may occur in which there is under-investment followed by
over-investment in both the South and the North.
These results, Vines argues, formalize Kaldor's conjectures that the
terms-of-trade linkage operates slowly and wastefully and tends to set
up perverse and unnecessary cycles in world economic activity.
A North-South Growth Model Along Kaldorian Lines
David Vines
Discussion Paper No. 26, August 1984 (IT)
|
|