|
|
Public
Finance
Indian debt
In recent years the
Indian public sector financial deficit and the primary, or non-interest,
deficit, have been rising in real terms and as a proportion of GNP. The
real values of the public debt and the public debt/GNP ratio are rising
sharply, and even the present value of public debt is increasing. This
pattern of debt and deficits may not be sustainable for four reasons.
First, if there is no debt neutrality, borrowing instead of taxing
current labour income will tend to raise private consumption, which will
either displace private investment and other interest-sensitive forms of
private spending or raise the deficit on the current account of the
balance of payments. Second, the absence of `first-order' debt
neutrality rules out the option of `tax smoothing' by running budget
deficits or surpluses when there are no lump-sum, non-distortionary,
tax-transfer schemes available. Third, the eventual monetization of
persistent deficits potentially involves serious inflationary
consequences. Fourth, a prolonged debt crisis may lead to the insolvency
or bankruptcy of the national Exchequer.
In Discussion Paper No. 408, Research Fellow Willem H Buiter and Urjit
R Patel focus on the third and fourth of these by reviewing briefly
some of the key facts concerning recent budgetary developments in India
and analysing whether the current and recent behaviour of key budgetary
and related time series is sustainable. They evaluate the eventual
inflationary implications of recourse to monetary financing by
estimating a demand function for base money, in order to calculate the
long-run inflation rate associated with different real revenues raised
by running the printing presses. Their estimated base money demand
function has very sharply diminishing real revenue returns from higher
inflation.
The results of their statistical and informal solvency tests and the
estimated demand function for base money indicate two main conclusions.
First, the continuation of recent patterns of behaviour would eventually
lead to the insolvency of the Exchequer. Second, the option of using the
inflation tax to close part of the budgetary gap is limited: small
increases in the share of seigniorage in GNP would have a high cost in
terms of additional long-run inflation, and even maximal use of the
inflation tax would not suffice to close the solvency gap.
Buiter and Patel also consider alternative policy options for dealing
with India's debt crisis. These fall into three categories: policies
aimed at ensuring larger primary surpluses or smaller primary deficits;
policies to reduce the interest cost of borrowing; and increased
recourse to seigniorage or the inflation tax.
Willem H Buiter and Urjit R Patel
Debt, Deficits and Inflation: An Application to the Public Finances of
India
Discussion
Paper No. 408, April 1990 (IM)
|
|