The term structure of interest rates has often been used to draw
inferences concerning the expectations of market participants. If a
policy change is believed to be permanent and its effects on interest
rates are understood, this should be reflected in the implied
theoretical relationship between short rates, which are observable, and
long rates, which are not. Changes in monetary policy regime may affect
the typical durability or `persistence' of changes in short rates. In
such cases, when the change in policy regime is believed to be durable,
long rates should change in accordance with changes in short rates. If
the long rate does not behave as predicted by the theory, this may
indicate that the policy regime is not credible. For example, if the
policy stance is credible, a temporary increase in short- term interest
rates with the stated intention of reducing inflation may, actually
reduce long rates, as occurred in the early 1980s in the UK. If it is
not credible e.g. if the rise in short rates is viewed as an adjustment
to a persistently more inflationary environment then long rates may
respond by rising rather than falling (as in the UK in early 1990).
In Discussion Paper No. 430, Research Fellow John Driffill uses
data on interest rates in the UK to study the credibility of changes in
macroeconomic policy regime. In his model of the term structure, the
yield on long bonds is a weighted average of the current yield on
three-month treasury bills and expected future yields, such that the
yield on the treasury bill equals the sum of the coupon yield and the
expected capital gain on the long bond. If an increase in short-term
interest rates is expected to be of short duration, the long rate should
increase only a little, whereas if it is expected to be permanent then
an equal increase in long rates is predicted.
Driffill uses UK quarterly data on treasury bill yields and long
government bond yields for the period 1959-87. He finds that bill yields
follow a first-order autoregressive process, with a structural break
around the end of 1974, while long bond yields only behave in accordance
with the model's predictions when a risk premium following a first-order
autoregressive process is added to the theoretically predicted yield.
Again, there is a structural break at the end of 1974.
He finds no evidence to support the view that the introduction of the
MTFS in 1980 affected the persistence of changes in short rates, nor
that there was any significant change in the response of long rates to
short rates then or since. These data do not point clearly to any change
in policy in 1980. There is, for example, no indication that the
Conservatives' low inflation stance reduced expectations of long-term
inflation and thereby reduced long-term interest rates relative to short
rates.
The Term Structure of Interest Rates: Structural Stability and
Macroeconomic Policy Changes in the UK
John Driffill
Discussion Paper No. 430, July 1990 (IM)