In many markets, `switching costs' give consumers a strong incentive
to continue buying from the same firm, even if other firms are selling
functionally identical products. This may rationally explain managers'
observed concern with market shares rather than short-run profits, since
firms' monopoly power over their customers makes current market share an
important determinant of future profits. There may also be implications
at the macroeconomic level concerning the counter-cyclical behaviour of
price-cost margins over the business cycle and the slow response of
trade balances to exchange rate changes.
In Discussion Paper No. 436, Alan Beggs and Research Fellow Paul
Klemperer present a multi-period model of a market with switching
costs that allows both for varying consumer expectations of future
prices and for the fact that not all new consumers buy from one firm.
New customers arrive and a fraction of old and new customers leave the
market in every period. In the last period, firms' power over existing
customers leads to high prices, while in the first period they typically
set low prices. In all other periods a firm trades off the desire to
exploit its current customer base against the need to attract new
customers. Beggs and Klemperer show that the incentive to set high
prices dominates: prices and therefore profits are higher as a result of
switching costs, and new entry may therefore be more attractive, even
though part of the market is locked into the incumbent's product.
Beggs and Klemperer examine the evolution of market shares and prices
after new entry and show that market shares converge to a stable
equilibrium, and if the firms face identical costs their shares will be
equal in the long run. Further, in the presence of switching costs,
prices rise if firms increase their discount rate, but they fall if
consumers do so. Prices fall with increases in consumer turnover or the
rate of growth of the market. Beggs and Klemperer distinguish
analytically between switching costs that are real such as transaction
costs and those that are artificial created by contracts or
repeat-purchase discounts, but they show that these both types have very
similar effects.
Finally, Beggs and Klemperer argue that the profitability of exploiting
current market share vis-à-vis the expected future benefit from
increasing market share varies over the business cycle, so consumer
switching costs may therefore explain observed variations in price-cost
margins, and they also examine the effects of expected changes to
taxation or the exchange rate on current behaviour. Although the model
formally represents a market with switching costs, similar results may
also apply to markets in which a firm's future profitability depends on
its current market share for other reasons, such as `search' costs to
consumers, the fact that past sales advertise a firm's product or even
`irrational' brand loyalty.
Multi-Period Competition with Switching Costs
Alan Beggs and Paul Klemperer
Discussion Paper No. 436, July 1990 (AM)