|
|
Macroeconomic
Policy
Dutch unemployment
Following the second oil crisis and the world recession of the late
1970s, Dutch unemployment rose to 12% in 1983, real GNP fell from 1980
to 1982, and public finances collapsed as social security payments rose
and tax receipts fell. In Discussion Paper No. 467, Hugo Keuzenkamp
and Research Fellow Frederick van der Ploeg maintain that the
ruling centrist-conservative coalition responded with a policy of
`benign neglect', by emphasizing the need to reduce the government
deficit at the expense of other objectives and assuming that the labour
market would solve its own problems.
Unemployment and the budget deficit both fell in the late 1980s, as a
result of wage moderation by the trade unions, increased industrial
competitiveness and the recovery of the world economy. The rate of
long-term unemployment rose relative to that of almost all other
countries and exerts no clear downward pressure on wages. Keuzenkamp and
van der Ploeg attribute the fall in the budget deficit in part to wage
moderation in the public sector which cannot be sustained if employees
move to the private sector and also to short-sighted policy measures.
These included the sale of public assets, which improved the
government's cash position at the expense of its net worth.
Keuzenkamp and van der Ploeg formulate ten rules for `sound government
finance' with which they analyse the relationship between savings,
investment and the current account. Given the openness of the Dutch
economy, the liberalization of international capital markets and the
commitment to pegging the stock of nominal government debt, investment
should have been financed through the current account of the balance of
payments. The authors find, however, that the government made no
effective use of the balance of payments to finance domestic investment:
indeed, the current account was in surplus for the whole period.
Keuzenkamp and van der Ploeg conclude that maintaining exchange rate
stability vis-à-vis the Deutschmark and increased monetary integration
were beneficial to the Dutch economy. Its performance would have been
improved, however, if the government had emphasized longer-term
objectives (such as reducing long-term employment and maintaining public
investment) and had sustained its current account by borrowing from
abroad. The new, centrist-left coalition that has governed the
Netherlands since the end of 1989 may improve economic performance by
investing in the future, reducing long-term unemployment and stopping
the decline in the government's net worth.
Savings, Investment, Government Finance and the Current Account: The
Dutch Experience
Hugo A Keuzenkamp and Frederick van der Ploeg
Discussion Paper No. 467, October 1990 (IM)
|
|