|
|
European
Monetary Union
Sterling's entry
When he was UK
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson decided upon full membership
of the EMS as an attractive alternative for combating inflation, but he
was unable to persuade the then Prime Minister of this view. He resigned
when she refused to disown the view of her personal economic adviser,
Sir Alan Walters, that the EMS is a `half-baked' system which would not
survive the removal of capital controls. According to the `Walters
critique', an inflationary economy entering the EMS without capital
controls will be forced by financial arbitrage to reduce nominal
interest rates, which in turn will reduce real interest rates, stimulate
the economy and exacerbate inflation, so the system is potentially
unstable. Only if the peg is not credible, according to Walters, will
this tendency for inflation to diverge be checked. Therefore,
paradoxically, the system can only survive if financial markets do not
believe in it!
In Discussion No. 480, Programme Director Marcus Miller and alan
Sutherland test Walters's argument using a macroeconomic model in
which exchange rate expectations play explicit roles in wage setting and
in determining interest rates. They find that the effects predicted by
Walters will not occur when financial and labour markets have common
beliefs about the permanence of the exchange rate peg, since the nominal
interest rate and the inflation rate move by the same amount. Contrary
to Walters, as the beliefs of agents in both markets in the credibility
of the peg increases, inflation decreases. The `perverse' real interest
rate effects will obtain, however, if financial markets view the peg as
credible while labour markets do not, although inflation will only
diverge `on impact' if the difference in credibility in the two markets
is large. The Walters critique therefore depends on `expectational
inconsistency'.
Miller and Sutherland argue further that even if inflation
<MI>does<D> diverge on impact, two powerful stabilizing
mechanisms remain. First, since the exchange rate is pegged to a
non-inflationary hard currency, rising prices lead to real exchange rate
appreciation which checks inflation, so the latter converges to zero.
Second, if there are <MI>no<D> realignments, a `learning
process' must result in a convergence to full credibility of the peg in
both markets, which will again reduce inflation to zero. Hence, even if
expectational inconsistency generates the short-run effects Walters
predicts, it will not lead to instability in the longer run. The
authors' analysis contradicts Walters's claim to have identified a fatal
flaw in the EMS. It implies further that if the UK's entry into the ERM
produces the perverse effects he predicts in the short run, the
appropriate remedy would not be to reduce the credibility of the peg in
financial markets but rather to increase its credibility among
wage-setters.
The `Walters Critique' of the EMS: A Case of Inconsistent
Expectations
Marcus Miller and Alan Sutherland
Discussion
Paper No. 480, November 1990 (IM)
|
|