|
|
Labour
Economics
Finnish manufacturing
Most economic models of trade union behaviour focus on the
determination of wages and employment. In the monopoly union model, the
union maximizes its objective function which includes wages for a given
labour demand curve; in the efficient bargain model, the firm and the
union negotiate both wages and employment; while in the so-called
`right-to-manage' model, the firm and the union negotiate over wages,
but the firm decides the level of employment. Traditional versions of
all these models typically neglect unions' possible effects on firms'
decisions concerning other factors of production in particular the
capital stock.
In Discussion Paper No. 506, Pasi Holm, Research Fellow Seppo
Honkapohja and Erkki Koskela develop a two-period monopoly
union model in which unions can affect the firm's choices of capital
stock, and firms' investment behaviour may depend on how wages are
determined. They estimate the model using annual data for Finnish
manufacturing industry for 1960-87 in this first empirical study of
trade union effects based on a model with endogenous capital stock, in
which they also incorporate a variety of taxes.
In the first period, the union chooses the wage level and the firm
chooses the capital stock. In the second, the firm decides on the level
of employment for given levels of wages and the capital stock. Comparing
equilibria, the authors find that higher unemployment benefit implies
higher wages and employment and a lower capital stock, while an
increased user cost of capital reduces both employment and the capital
stock with no effect on wages. Moreover, under reasonable assumptions,
increasing the income tax rate reduces both employment and the capital
stock but increases wages.
The authors find that their system of equations to describe the
determination of capital stock, wages and hours of work performs
reasonably well, with no obvious signs of misspecification. They also
use the results of various non-econometric tests to show that their
model's hypothesis that hours of work are determined recursively after
the wage-capital stock game fits the data better than the alternatives
suggested by the conventional theory of demand for factors of
production.
A Monopoly Union Model of Wage Determination with Taxes and
Endogenous Capital Stock: An Empirical Application to the Finnish
Manufacturing Industry
Pasi Holm, Seppo Honkapohja and Erkki Koskela
Discussion Paper No. 506, January 1991 (AM)
|
|