|
|
Labour
Economics
German unification
German unification
created a single labour market from two disparate regions with vastly
different productivity levels. Although East German real wages might
have been expected to converge to West German levels eventually, their
rapid rise to some 60% above the previous year's level by the summer of
1991 was quite remarkable. It is hard to reconcile with the rapid
increases in open and hidden unemployment in the region (which might
have been expected to restrain such a wage surge), the decline in
Eastern German measured output per worker and the continued steady
growth of real wages in the West.
In Discussion Paper No. 573, Research Fellow Michael Burda and Michael
Funke extend models of union behaviour and collective bargaining to
allow for the fact that most wage contracts in the East were in fact
negotiated by Western labour unions. Their simplest monopoly union
model, in which the union can discriminate perfectly between East and
West, generates wage differentials that reflect differing demand and
supply conditions and the elasticities of labour demand in the two
regions. Their results suggest that unions' mark-ups over the
competitive wage should be higher in the West than in the East, which is
inconsistent with those actually observed.
Burda and Funke therefore extend their model to test whether migration
affects the fall-back wage that would clear the market in the union's
absence and they find that migration unambiguously compresses East-West
wage differentials. If labour is perfectly mobile, the wage differential
merely reflects any difference in the two regions' elasticities of
labour demand. To the extent that labour mobility is imperfect, the
monopoly union can `segment' the market. A union that considers
migration in setting its demands is likely to price labour more
expensively in the East according to the weight it places on rents
earned there.
Burda and Funke find that bargaining models that allow for
Pareto-superior contracts and/or the power of management yield some
additional insights in the determination of wages. They conclude that
government subsidization of firms will reduce the firms' fall-back
positions and increase the bargained wage. The Treuhand's policy of
extending subsidies to those firms in the East that have yet to be
privatized therefore entails a danger of higher Eastern wage outcomes,
which suggests that a form of `soft budget constraint' may apply to the
transformation of the East European economies.
German
Trade Unions after Unification: Third Degree Wage Discriminating
Monopolists?
Michael Burda and Michael Funke
Discussion Paper No. 573, August 1991 (AM)
|
|