|
|
European
Monetary Union
The final stage
Despite the enormous
literature on the European Community's planned economic and monetary
union (EMU), there has been little analysis of the ultimate step: the
replacement of national currencies with a single currency. In Discussion
Paper No. 591, Research Fellow Alberto Giovannini considers such
a replacement of the several national currencies with a single currency,
when holders of cash balances obtain new bank-notes by presenting the
old ones and all outstanding nominal assets and liabilities are
rewritten.
When a single country undertakes a reform, its government has an
unconstrained choice of conversion rate without affecting real
variables. When two countries introduce a common currency, however,
their conversion rates are constrained because they determine the
exchange rate between the two `old' currencies at the time of the
reform. If this differs from their nominal exchange rate immediately
before the reform, then with flexible prices the reform will affect the
real economy through the wealth and substitution effects of changes to
the real money stock.
Giovannini disputes the view that relative price distortions arising
from the `less-than-full' credibility of the current gradualist plan in
some participating countries may justify a `final realignment' when the
single currency is introduced. Unless the public displays a form of
money illusion by mistakenly applying the official conversion rates to
translate outstanding nominal contracts, no exchange rate devaluation at
that point could significantly affect relative prices. Mandating
conversion rates acts as a form of incomes policy by imposing a new set
of real payments on private agents' outstanding nominal contracts. If
governments wish to correct misalignments that arise from the lack of
credibility of the fixed exchange rate, they should choose the
conversion rate for prices and wages that will induce precisely the
exchange rate depreciation that wage and price setters originally
expected. Eliminating exchange rate surprises will thereby eliminate
distortions and minimize the welfare costs of expectations errors.
This suggests that transition to a single currency could be smoothed by
announcing the conversion rates in advance say two years ahead as the
intentions of the individual governments, endorsed by the Commission.
This would allow the necessary adjustments to take place if credibility
problems arise, for example from unforeseen exogenous shocks. If the
conversion rates are credible, the economies will have time to adapt to
them, and the final reform will entail only minimal disruptions; if they
are not credible, governments should act to ensure that expectations are
fulfilled.
The
Currency Reform as the Last Stage of Economic and Monetary Union: Some
Policy Questions
Alberto Giovannini
Discussion Paper No. 591, October 1991 (IM)
|
|