|
|
Labour
Markets
Spanish policies
The possible
harmonization of labour market regulation is a major issue in Europe's
political and monetary union, since labour market rigidities are widely
thought to be a key factor in the sustained rise in unemployment
experienced by many countries. Many governments have reacted with
measures to increase flexibility. Many European countries have
introduced `flexible' labour contracts with fixed duration and low
firing costs but harmonization of EC labour markets now requires
identification of the most promising system for employment.
Such flexible labour contracts were adopted widely in the late 1980s in
Spain, which experienced a sharp rise in employment at the same time. In
Discussion Paper No. 596, Samuel Bentolila and Research Fellow Gilles
Saint-Paul construct a model of such contracts and test it on
Spanish data to determine how much extra unemployment was due to the new
contracts. Their model distinguishes `rigid' and `flexible' labour,
holding permanent and temporary contracts respectively, which also have
different productivities and wages. There are many firms, each of which
is in a `high' or a `low' state `expansion' or `recession' whose
individual behaviour is governed by their probabilities of switching
from one state to the other. Aggregate recessions occur when a greater
proportion of firms switch from the high to the low state than vice
versa; each firm's overall probability of falling into recession depends
on the aggregate and firm-specific probabilities of recession. The rigid
labour force can be reduced either by firing a number of workers and
paying the firing cost or by reducing it progressively and incurring a
cost per unit of time.
The authors note four main predictions. First, flexible contracts tend
to increase the size of the employment response to cyclical
fluctuations. Second, the response of employment to cyclical
fluctuations will be faster with flexible than with rigid contracts.
Third, the impact on average employment is ambiguous, since it depends
on parameter values. Finally, after the introduction of flexible
contracts, employment will temporarily overshoot its long-run value.
Bentolila and Saint-Paul suggest that the surge in employment following
their introduction in Spain may have been due to its stronger response
to the world-wide recovery and to such overshooting. Empirical testing
of the model on a panel of Spanish firms confirms the model's prediction
of larger employment fluctuations along the business cycle, but the data
provide no support for its prediction of lower employment persistence.
This suggests a need for further empirical research on the transitory
dynamics of the introduction of flexible labour contracts.
The
Macroeconomic Impact of Flexible Labour Contracts: An Application to
Spain
Samuel Bentolila and Gilles Saint-Paul
Discussion Paper No. 596, December 1991 (IM)
|
|