|
|
Business
Cycles
Modelling the G7
Recent work by Kydland and Prescott to develop a
stochastic dynamic general equilibrium version of the `real business
cycle' (RBC) model of the US economy has provoked lively debate, but
there have been few attempts to test their model with alternative data
sets. In Discussion Paper No. 681, Riccardo Fiorito and Research
Fellow Tryphon Kollintzas apply their methodology to investigate
the stylized facts of business cycles using quarterly data for the G7
countries during 1960-89. They find that current versions of the RBC
model can qualitatively (and often quantitatively) account for several
important stylized facts in all seven economies, which display
considerable regularities in the behaviour of output and most of its
expenditure components. Most of these components are procyclical, with
consumption generally fluctuating less and investment considerably more
than real GNP or GDP; net exports and prices are countercyclical; while
money has no clear-cut pattern across countries or definitions of the
money stock.
The RBC model's predictions are not supported by their evidence on
labour dynamics, however, since variations in employment are too small
and those in hours per worker too large; employment lags output
everywhere while hours per worker are coincidental or leading, which
contradicts model formulations in which adjustments to employment are
explicitly or implicitly synchronous with output. Even where the
variability of total hours is about right, the variability of its
components is not. In some models, hours per worker are fixed, so
variability reflects changes in employment only. Models that allow hours
per worker to vary grossly underpredict its variability and do not pick
up the lagged adjustment of employment.
Fiorito and Kollintzas propose modifying the RBC model to account for
these findings by allowing for labour hoarding, so firms that find it
more costly to adjust employment than hours per worker use labour
intensively in expansions and less so in contractions. This is
consistent with survey and time-series data in US manufacturing and
elsewhere and also with the observed facts that employment in Europe and
Japan fluctuates less than in North America while total hours fluctuate
much more than employment. Labour institutions in Europe and Japan
present stronger impediments to adjustment and information flows, so
labour hoarding may be more important than in North America. The authors
conclude by proposing to develop RBC models to account for these
empirical findings, which should incorporate the variable utilization of
employment and adjustment costs.
Stylized Facts of
Business Cycles in the G7 from a Real Business Cycles Perspective
Riccardo Fiorito and Tryphon Kollintzas
Discussion Paper No. 681, July 1992 (IM)
|
|