|
|
European
Integration
A common labour
market?
Liberalizing
cross-border movements of workers within the European Community has had
no discernible effect on labour markets, largely on account of remaining
cultural and linguistic barriers to mobility. In Discussion Paper No.
694, Research Fellow Jean-Pierre Danthine and Jennifer Hunt
argue that European economic integration will nevertheless affect labour
markets. Recent empirical work suggests that countries with highly
centralized wage-bargaining structures (Austria and the Nordic
countries) and those with highly decentralized labour market
institutions (Japan, Switzerland and the US) exhibit stronger employment
performance than those `in between' (including most EC member states).
This will clearly assume policy relevance if the EFTA countries join the
Community.
Danthine and Hunt consider how increased product market competition
modifies the optimal strategies of unions that exert significant market
power, and hence employment and wages. As two fully centralized
economies integrate to form one, their unions must merge to maintain a
`corporatist' structure. Bargaining at the `wrong' level in an
imperfectly integrated world entails high employment costs, but it is
less damaging as competition intensifies; as the trade-off between wages
and unemployment deteriorates, unions attach less weight to high wages.
Integrating corporatist economies has a discrete negative impact on
their efficiency as national unions impose externalities on one another,
but this is offset by strong international competition, which reduces
the unions' margin for manoeuvre and substitutes market discipline for
global vision.
Danthine and Hunt then consider competition between alternative models
within the single market. Results from their two-country model suggest
that a corporatist economy will suffer from imperfect integration with a
more decentralized competitor, whose performance is less sensitive to
its partner's wage-bargaining structure; but the harmful effects of
bargaining at the `wrong' level diminish as integration proceeds. Full
economic integration therefore need not threaten the coexistence of
different national systems of wage setting. The authors caution,
however, that the similar performance of these two labour markets after
integration conceals very different processes of adaptation. Centralized
economies must undergo much more price and wage adjustment than
decentralized ones for the equilibrium price level finally to stabilize
below the level that prevails initially in the decentralized economy,
while wage differences also fall sharply. Real-world unions will
therefore adapt more slowly than the rational unions in this model; in
centralized economies, unions may find it difficult to alter
long-standing practices, so the effects of integration on unemployment
are likely to be less favourable than this model suggests.
Wage Bargaining Structure, Employment and Economic Integration
Jean-Pierre Danthine and Jennifer Hunt
Discussion Paper No. 694, July 1992 (IM)
|
|