|
|
European
Monetary Union
Regional insurance
The central government budget in a common currency area provides
`regional insurance' by dampening any reduction to the income of a
region in recession, which may compensate for its inability to modify
its terms of trade by altering its exchange rate. In the European
Community, the parts of national government budgets that provide
regional insurance are mainly designed for income redistribution and
general revenue-raising. In Discussion Paper No. 697, Research Fellow Jacques
Mélitz and Silvia Vori stress the need to distinguish the
stabilizing and redistributive effects of the central government budget:
temporary measures such as unemployment compensation can have a
substantial stabilizing effect on regional income with no permanent
equalizing effect, while measures of income redistribution that are not
affected by current shocks (expenditure on general education) or which
depend on employment (old age and maternity benefits), can affect
regional income differentials without playing any stabilizing role.
Mélitz and Vori examine the creation of a common Community insurance
fund from which regular disbursements would be made to member states on
the basis of their relative misfortunes to offset the loss of national
macroeconomic policy autonomy. Such insurance may be valuable when the
`national reference levels' are defined in terms of income, since
standard deviations of some 2% of per capita income amount to a
significant risk, but they find strong potential for such insurance only
in Denmark, Ireland and the UK. In Belgium, France, Greece and Spain,
little insurance is feasible, since bad outcomes at home tend to be
matched by bad outcomes in the rest of the Community; the position is
only slightly better for Germany and Italy. Similar results based on
national unemployment rates are even less encouraging.
Mélitz and Vori also examine the response of insured values to common
external and country-specific shocks but find little evidence of
unevenness, and even this depends heavily on the method of measurement.
They suggest in conclusion that EC member states may do better to seek
insurance in the traditional manner, as a by product of future
enlargement of the Community central budget and broader national
identification with Community interests.
National Insurance Against Unevenly Distributed Shocks in a European
Monetary Union
Jacques Mélitz and Silvia Vori
Discussion Paper No. 697, August 1992 (IM)
|
|