|
|
European
Monetary Union
Fiscal
coordination
The Delors Report and the Maastricht Treaty have called for fiscal
policy coordination within a European monetary union, but this remains
highly controversial. In Discussion Paper No. 701, Research Fellow Paul
Levine and Joseph Pearlman develop a model of a monetary
union grounded in dynamic game theory. The model has two economies with
identical structures that produce imperfect substitutes. There are many
competitive firms and goods markets clear instantly; labour consists of
a unionized sector that provides output gains from surprise inflation
and a competitive sector that clears at all times. Debt neutrality is
violated since households leave no anticipated bequests, the population
grows exogenously, and governments finance expenditure through
distortionary taxation or borrowing.
Levine and Pearlman impose a fixed nominal exchange rate and introduce a
common central bank (the ECB) in one- and two-good versions of their
model to assess the effects of economic integration. They compare
non-cooperative and cooperative equilibria to assess the possible gains
from fiscal policy coordination with an independent ECB and from full
fiscal and monetary policy coordination. In their worst case the
`unpleasant monetary arithmetic' the independent ECB responds to a
rising national government debt/GDP ratio with a looser monetary stance,
in effect monetizing the debt. This results in high inflation, high
debt/GDP ratios and excessive public spending. In the intermediate case,
the fiscal authorities bear sole responsibility for their own solvency,
and again there is excessive public spending, but government debt and
inflation are contained. In both cases, fiscal coordination is
counterproductive. The best outcome occurs when credible inflation
targeting by the ECB eliminates the fiscal authorities' incentive to
create surprise inflation and allows welfare gains from fiscal
coordination, but these are only substantial in the two-good case, in
which countries still seek to improve their terms of trade.
Fiscal and Monetary Policy Under EMU: Credible Inflation Targets or
Unpleasant Monetary Arithmetic?
Paul Levine and Joseph Pearlman
Discussion Paper No. 701, August 1992 (IM)
|
|