|
|
European
Monetary Union
Costs and benefits
Many argue that the
main cost of European monetary union will be countries' loss of autonomy
to alter the exchange rate in the face of asymmetric or idiosyncratic
shocks. In Discussion Paper No. 722, Research Fellow Charles Bean
finds that European countries are no more prone to asymmetric supply
shocks than US regions, and he argues that monetary union will reduce
asymmetric demand shocks. European wages are not responsive to
unemployment but they do respond rapidly to price movements, so nominal
inertia is relatively low and little is lost by giving up exchange rate
autonomy. Countries may also benefit from the elimination of volatility
and from the adoption of a credible counter-inflationary constitution;
on the other hand, empirical studies have rarely found large efficiency
gains from reduced volatility, and high-inflation countries could reform
their institutions independently.
Bean examines the statutes of the proposed European Central Bank (ECB),
which he maintains is more likely to follow discretion than a rigidly
fixed rule, although Germany has little reason to fear that the ECB will
be any less counter-inflationary than the Bundesbank. Also, the omission
of any discussion of the supervisory role for the ECB masks profound
differences across member countries, and there is no coherent
justification for the proposed `convergence criteria', which risk a
contractionary fiscal bias as high-debt countries strive to meet them.
Looking at interregional fiscal flows, Bean argues that comparisons with
the US are inappropriate, since Europe's low labour mobility ensures a
role for national fiscal policies. Interregional fiscal flows may
nevertheless be desirable on insurance grounds, for which Community
structural funds are too bureaucratic and susceptible to rent-seeking
activities. Bean proposes a more direct, automatic and democratically
accountable mechanism and concludes that such fiscal issues are much
more important than those posed by the introduction of a common
currency.
Economic and Monetary Union in Europe
Charles R Bean
Discussion
Paper No. 722, October 1992 (IM)
|
|