|
|
Unemployment
Growth effects
Conventional
macroeconomic theory predicts that growth depends on exogenous, labour-augmenting
technical progress and that the `natural' rate of unemployment depends
on labour market institutions. Recent theoretical work suggests that an
increase in productivity growth raises the present value of profits from
new job creation and hence reduces unemployment (`capitalization') and
that productivity growth through the replacement of low-productivity
jobs by high-productivity jobs elsewhere in the economy raises
unemployment (`reallocation'). Causality may also run from unemployment
to growth if high or prolonged unemployment reduces learning-by-doing or
the pool of savings available for investment.
In Discussion Paper No. 723, Research Fellow Charles Bean and Christopher
Pissarides develop a simple overlapping generations endogenous
growth model, with unemployment due to frictions in the labour market,
but without `capitalization' or `reallocation'. The model shows that
unemployment and growth need not be inversely related since they are now
jointly determined endogenous variables. For example, an increase in
workers' bargaining strength that reduces employment may increase growth
by redistributing income to those with higher propensities to save. An
increase in the propensity to consume will reduce growth and leave
unemployment unchanged, which is at variance with some Keynesian models
in which accelerator effects on investment also raise future output.
Bean and Pissarides adopt a `New Keynesian' approach by introducing a
separate imperfectly competitive consumption goods sector, rather than
an accelerator effect. They find that an increased propensity to consume
raises not only consumption, but also employment and output through the
effect of a deeper market on competition and the price mark-up. If this
effect is strong enough, total savings and investment will also increase
and hence raise the growth rate.
Unemployment, Consumption and Growth
Charles Bean and Christopher Pissarides
Discussion
Paper No. 723, October 1992 (IM)
|
|