|
A government's optimal mix of tax and seigniorage revenues tilts
towards inflationary finance as the ruling party is less
inflation-averse, the cost of tax collection larger, tax evasion more
widespread and financial repression greater. In Discussion Paper No.
741, Roel Beetsma and Research Fellow Frederick van der Ploeg
develop a model of an unequal but democratic society in which a minority
holds much of the debt, so a government representing the median voter
has an incentive to create `surprise' inflation to erode its real value.
When a government can commit itself, money growth and inflation are
higher the greater are the output costs of an inefficient tax system, or
if output costs from inflation or growth-corrected real interest rates
fall. The distribution of assets has no effect. Under `discretion',
however, inequality further motivates inflation surprises to
redistribute wealth to the relatively poorer median voter. Since
rational agents anticipate this, nominal interest rates are higher and
welfare lower the greater is the inequality. |