|
|
European
Monetary Union
Fiscal rules
The Maastricht
fiscal convergence criteria require general government budget deficits
and gross debt to be within 3% and 60% of GDP respectively. In
Discussion Paper No. 750, Research Fellows Willem Buiter and Nouriel
Roubini, with Giancarlo Corsetti, argue that the debt/GDP
ratio must be ignored to avoid massive unnecessary fiscal deflations in
Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands. Pursuing the
deficit/GDP ratio would hurt Greece and Italy, be moderately painful for
Belgium and Portugal and relatively painless elsewhere. Indeed, its
adoption might help countries such as Italy which receive some fiscal
backbone from international agreements. The authors maintain that
countries that have initiated fiscal retrenchment should be allowed to
ignore the debt norm and pursue the deficit norm gradually.
The transitional output and unemployment cost of the deficit criterion
will depend on EC-wide monetary policy. High nominal and real interest
rates reflect the savings-investment imbalances due to the East European
transformations and the deficit financing of East German reconstruction,
and also the Bundesbank's restrictive monetary stance. The German policy
mix increased significantly the real interest burden of public debt and
deepened the recession in the non-German ERM member countries, and
contributed to cyclical increases in their public sector deficits.
Buiter, Corsetti and Roubini conclude that the deficit guideline should
be corrected to include cyclical inflation and growth and the effects of
capital expenditures on future government revenues. Similarly, the debt
criterion should refer to the non-monetary liabilities of the
consolidated public sector rather than gross debt. Binding fiscal rules
might be useful to combat `excessive deficits' caused by political
distortions, but the Maastricht convergence criteria entail a risk of
serious overkill.
Excessive Deficits: Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht
Willem H Buiter, Giancarlo Corsetti and Nouriel Roubini
Discussion
Paper No. 750, December 1992 (IM)
|
|