|
|
Public
Debt
Default risk
Many governments that are now seeking to reduce their debt/GDP ratios
will require enormous budget surpluses to achieve this stabilization. In
Discussion Paper No. 787, Francesco Drudi and Research Affiliate Alessandro
Prati develop a model of costs of default on government debt. The
public is uncertain about whether the government will favour the `poor'
by levying a `surprise' tax on the debt or the `rich' by following the
`sustainable' policy of repaying the debt in full.
Drudi and Prati show that the public's uncertainty about the
government's type may or may not be resolved depending on the two types'
relative preferences and initial reputation. Once a lasting surplus is
achieved, however, a `defaulting' government has no incentive to mimic
the `sustainable' policy, so a risk premium arises when it is on the
verge of achieving such a surplus. If its initial reputation is `bad' or
its total expenditure large, however, this premium may become `too high'
for any debt to be sold; the public anticipates that either type of
government will levy a surprise tax.
Drudi and Prati then relate their results to the Maastricht Treaty
conditions to show that the deficit condition will distinguish
`sustainable' from `defaulting' governments, but the debt threshold may
be `too tight'. Under certain conditions it will exclude some
governments that have `bad' initial reputations or face high interest
rates, while ignoring their commitment to `sustainable' policies; it may
also admit some with `good' reputations whose policies will in fact lead
to default. Drawing policy implications requires caution, however:
excluding countries that may default is not the only rationale for the
Maastricht rules; the assumption that no risk premium is needed once the
`sustainable' government signals its type may not apply if governments
change frequently; and they can also meet the Maastricht rules by
cutting expenditure instead of increasing taxes.
Signalling Debt Sustainability
Francesco Drudi and Alessandro Prati
Discussion Paper No. 787, May 1993 (IM)
|
|