|
|
Public
Debt
The US deficit
The past twelve years have witnessed the only sustained, non-cyclical
peacetime increase in the Federal debt/GDP ratio in US history apart
from the Great Depression. In Discussion Paper No. 791, Research Fellow Willem
Buiter estimates the `permanent primary gap' the permanent
improvement in the primary deficit/GDP ratio needed to maintain solvency
inherited by the Clinton Administration at 0.35-1.65% of GDP; its
proposals for an average, cyclically-corrected primary Federal surplus
of 0.13% of GDP for 1993-8 will yield an improvement of only 0.12-1.02%
of GDP, so further fiscal tightening will be needed to maintain
government solvency.
Even without endangering solvency, however, high debt risks excessive
monetary growth and inflation and may also lead to financial crowding
out, if the substitution of borrowing for current taxation redistributes
resources from young to old. The US savings rate is already low by
historical and international standards and it could be raised by
measures to reduce the deficit, but countercyclical variations are also
desirable for both Keynesian and neoclassical, tax-smoothing reasons.
Problems in financing the Clinton Administration's ambitious programmes
to improve health care and insurance, education and training and
research and development; to revitalize the inner cities, and to invest
in the infrastructure of public transport and telecommunications are all
likely to dwarf those of coping with inherited debt. Buiter notes that
the Federal government spends less than 8% of GDP on purchases of
current goods and services, while total general government receipts
account for the smallest fraction of GDP of any industrialized country.
US voters have to date been unwilling to bear the tax burden required by
the Clinton Administration's agenda, so its main challenge is to build a
coalition capable of raising the equilibrium share of current revenues
in GDP towards the OECD average.
Public Debt in the USA: How Much, How Bad and Who Pays?
Willem H Buiter
Discussion Paper No. 791, June 1993 (IM)
|
|