|
Many suppliers prefer to ration products than to raise prices to
clear the market, as for example when restaurants, cinemas and sports
events turn away the last customers to arrive rather than inviting bids
for seats. In Discussion Paper No. 805, Richard Gilbert and
Research Fellow Paul Klemperer propose that they may be rational
to set prices that create excess demand and ration output if consumers
incur sunk costs specific to the seller before using its product.
Rationing remains inefficient ex post, but it may be rational for the
seller if rationing in some states of demand allows higher prices and
profits in others. Setting prices to clear the market requires high
(low) prices when demand is high (low) for consumers to cover their sunk
costs, which favours those in the market when demand is low. If marginal
consumers are unlikely to be in the market then, sellers will incur
costs by charging low prices and they may do better to attract them at
lower cost by charging less than market-clearing prices under high
demand. This model may also account for employers' setting wages that
create an excess supply of labour and also for `second-sourcing' buyers'
purchase of some inputs from an inferior, e.g. more costly, supplier. |